New Research on Ankle Taping

My friend Dan Lorenz, MS, PT, ATC/L, CSCS recently summarized two new research articles on ankle taping.  Many of us take ankle taping for granted and assume since it is so common that it must be effective.  Below is Dan’s summary of the two articles with some of my comments below.

New Research on Ankle Taping

Ankle TapingTwo recent articles in the American Journal of Sports Medicine on ankle taping are relevant to the sports physical therapist.  In a study by Refshauge et al, researchers sought to determine if ankle taping improved detection of inversion/eversion movements in individuals with recurrent ankle sprain.  In 16 subjects with recurrent ankle sprain were tested in a taped and untaped condition.  The threshold for movement detection was tested at three velocities.

Researchers found that the application of tape actually decreased the ability to detect movements at the ankle.  They concluded that the efficacy of taping is unlikely to be explained by an enhanced ability to detect inversion or eversion movements.  Two theories exist as to the mechanism of proprioceptive acuity that is believed to improve with the application of tape.  One theory is that the close contact between tape and skin increases afferent traffic arising from the cutaneous receptors.  The other is that the tape may increase cutaneous input that converges on muscle afferents, thereby increasing excitability of the motorneuron pool.

In another study, Purcell et al examined the differences in ankle range of motion before and after exercise in two tape conditions: traditional cloth tape and self-adherent tape (PowerTape).  In both groups, the skin was clean, dry, and unshaven.  For the white cloth tape condition, skin was sprayed with tape adherent and prewrap was used.  The cloth tape job involved 3 stirrups, two heel locks (one medial and one lateral), and a figure-of-8 strip.  In the self adherent group, self-adherent prewrap was applied midcalf to midfoot, incorporating two heel locks.  Following this, the wrap was compressed with direct hand pressure.

The self-adherent tape was applied in a similar fashion as the cloth tape, except that heel-lock and figure-of-8 strips were alternated.  ROM was measured before, after application of tape, and after 30 minutes of exercise using an electrogoniometer.

Researchers found that white cloth and self-adherent tape both restricted inversion to eversion ROM immediately after application, but with 30 minutes of exercise, only the self-adherent tape maintained the decreased ROM.  For plantar and dorsiflexion, both tape groups decreased ROM immediately after application and after 30 minutes of exercise.   Researchers concluded that self-adherent tape better restricts frontal plane ankle motion compared to cloth tape, although both do a satisfactory job decreasing sagittal plane motion.


Clinical Implications

It is always good to reflect back on what we do clinically as new research is published.  These two articles are interesting and show that ankle taping can be effective in both altering proprioception and limiting ankle range of motion.  However, the use of self-adherent tape appears to be more effective than traditional cloth tape.

One of the biggest criticisms of traditional cloth tape was that it loosens over time.  It appears that the use of self-adherent tape, such as PowerFlex and PowerTape, are more effective.  I have used both and do agree that the self-adherent tape feels great.  What do you think?

Here is an example of the self-adherent tape technique:





Why McConnell Patellar Taping Works

patellar tapingOne of the most common, yet least understood, treatment technique for patellofemoral pain may be patellar taping, or also referred to as McConnell taping.  First introduced in 1984 by  Jenny McConnell, a physical therapist in Australia, patellar taping has become increasingly popular.  The original intent of performing patellar taping was to alter the tilt and position of the patella, most commonly by shifting a laterally displaced patella more medially to correct patellofemoral “tracking” problems.

To date, numerous research has been conducted on the efficacy of patellofemoral taping with conflicting results.  For every study that shows altered patella kinematics, enhanced EMG and muscle function, improved dynamic alignment, and decreased patellofemoral joint reaction forces, there seems to be another study that shows just the opposite.  One thing is certain, though, most studies do tend to agree that patellar taping decreases pain in patellofemoral pain syndrome patients (PFPS).  The question is, why?

Patellar Taping – A Possible Reason as to Why it Works?

A study was published earlier this year that I think explains the mechanism by which patellar taping may work.  Actually, the authors of the study didn’t mention this mechanism at all in the paper and it really wasn’t what they studied, but after I read the article, I had one of those “Ah-Ha” moments!  I’ll explain later, but first let’s discuss the article.

McConnell Taping and Dynamic MRI

A recent study by Derasari et al in the Journal of Physical Therapy sought to examine patellar kinematics in patellofemoral pain patients after McConnell taping using dynamic MRI.  This is the first study to assess patellofemoral kinematics in 6-degrees-of-freedom during active knee extension.

14 subjects that had PFPS for greater 1 year were included in the study and underwent dynamic MRI during active knee extension with and without patellar taping.   Standard McConnell taping was apply in the lateral-to-medial direction in an attempt to glide the patella medially, such as in this photo:

McConnell Taping

Results of the study showed that patellar taping produced a significant shift of the patella in the inferior direction, not medial.  In fact, the study demonstrated that not all patients with PFPS had a laterally displaced patella to begin with, some were medially displaced.  However (and this is when the light bulb went off for me), those with a medially displaced patella actually saw a lateral shift in patella position after taping, even though the tape was applied in the standard lateral-to-medial direction.  The patella shifted against the tape direction!  This is also probably why there is so much conflicting research in the literature.

Why Patellar Taping Really Works

This study was a big “Ah-Ha” moment for me, and I think we may have found a viable reason to explain why patellofemoral taping works.  Think about it, patellar taping in the lateral-to-medial direction did cause a medial shift in the patella for those that were laterally displaced, but it produced just the opposite in people that were medially displaced, the patella actually moved against the direction of taping. Why?

After reading this study I think that taping doesn’t shift the patella in one direction, what it does is compress the patellofemoral joint.  Take a look at the figures below.  The figure on the left shows a patellofemoral joint with a laterally displaced patella, it does not sit centered within the trochlea groove.  The figure to the right is that same knee, but now with patellar tape (orange line) applied.  As you can see, it centers the patella within the groove but compressing it, the patella glides against the ridge of the trochlea:

patellfemoral joint patellar tape

The same holds true for the medially displaced patella, even if you tape in the lateral-to-medial direction, it doesn’t matter, the patellar actually shifts laterally in this case because again is glides with the trochlea groove:

image patellofemoral tape

imageThis essentially causes a “centering effect” of the patellofemoral joint by compressing it within the trochlea groove.  Subsequently, this “centering effect” increases the patellofemoral contact area, which likely has a significant impact on pain.

It is well documented that a displaced patella causes the patellofemoral contact area to decrease, causing the same amount of force to be applied to a more focal area.  By centering the patella within the trochlea, this force is distributed across a larger surface area and stress on the cartilage is decreased (for more information on this, subscribe to my newsletter and read my free eBook Solving the Patellofemoral Mystery).  As you can see in the below figures, if the same amount of force is applied to a larger area of contact, the force is distributed more evenly across the cartilage:

image image

Obviously, more research needs to be conducted, but this hypothesis seems to have some potential validity and may explain why why patellar taping works and why there is so much conflict in the literature.  If you like this kind of thing like I do, read my eBook Solving the Patellofemoral Mystery, free to all my newsletter subscribers.

Based on your experience, do you agree?  Think differently?  Why do you think patellar taping works?