The Effect of Ipsilateral and Contralateral Loading on Muscle Activity During the Lunge

The Effect of Ipsilateral and Contralateral Loading on Muscle Activity During the Lunge

One thing I talk about a lot when it comes to training and rehabilitation is the need to train the body in all three planes.  This often requires moving in one plane of motion and stabilizing in the other two.   We are often very good at moving in the sagittal plane, and poor at stabilizing in the transverse and frontal planes.  This is a big topic of discussion in my program Functional Stability Training of the Lower Body.

To enhance this triplanar stability, we often attempt to facilitate greater contraction of the gluteus medius muscle during sagittal plane exercises.  The lunge in particular is a great exercise for triplanar stability as the narrow stance challenges strength in the sagittal plane and stability in the transverse and frontal planes.


The Effect of Ipsilateral and Contralateral Loading on Muscle Activity During the Lunge

The Effect of Ipsilateral and Contralateral Loading on Muscle Activity During the LungeA recent study was published in the Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research that investigated the effect of holding a dumbbell in either the contralateral or ipsilateral hand during a split squat and forward lunge.  (Note: they called it a “walking lunge” but I am 99% certain it was a forward lunge, so I’m just going to say forward lunger in this article…  probably just semantics.)

The study found that:

  • Holding the dumbbell on the ipsilateral side had no effect on glute med activity.
  • Holding the dumbbell on the contralateral side resulted in a significant increase in glute med activity, but only during the forward lunge, not the split squat.

I was a bit surprised that glute med activity was not impacted during the split squat, but perhaps the static nature of the position inherently requires less transverse and frontal plane stability.

There was one other finding from this study that I thought was interesting.  Kinematic differences during the forward lunge were found between a group of trained individuals in comparison to a group without training experience.

This makes sense as the forward lunge is a complex movement pattern that requires an understanding of how to control the pattern.  It requires both mobility and stability, but also the ability to control the eccentric deceleration phase.

contralateral lungeHowever, there were no kinematic differences between training age during the split squat, meaning that both novice and experienced trainees performed the split squat in a similar fashion.  This make split squats a great exercise to incorporate in the early phases of training for those with limited training experience, eventually progressing to forward lunge as they get better at moving and stabilizing the pattern.

This helps solidify the use of split squats in our lunge regression system.



I like simple studies like this.  Having the rationale to make small tweaks to your program is what sets you apart.  It’s the small things that may not be obvious at first but will produce better results over time.

Based on these results, I would recommend using the split squat with bilateral dumbbells to maximize strength gains since a unilateral load did not alter glute med activity.  The split squat is more of a basic exercise, so why not just use it to work on strength gains in the novice trainee.  As the person progresses, you can add the forward lunge variation with a contralateral load to enhance triplanar stability.




6 replies
  1. Elsbeth Vaino, CSCS
    Elsbeth Vaino, CSCS says:

    Great post and I am about to go read the study now. But I’m curious about your conclusion. The study showed no difference in glut med involvement between ipsi and contralateral loading for split squats; only for lunges, but the tweak you’ll do to your programming is to use bilateral load for split squats? Not sure that is an appropriate take away? I read your post and thought that I need to start adding lunge walks with a contralateral load, as I don’t currently do them. After I read the study I think I will rethink my use of ipsilateral loading in split squats – although I wonder if there are other core benefits to it? Lastly, I also wonder if benefits from contralateral loading can be extrapolated to also exist with ipsilateral loading (also in your proposed tweak)? Thanks for making me think.

  2. Brad Corcoran
    Brad Corcoran says:

    Josh, the loading went as follows:

    Body weight x5/side – 60s rest between legs
    1-3 min rest
    12.5kg DB x5/side – 60s rest between legs
    1-3 min rest
    25kg DB x5/side – 60s rest between legs
    Process and 12.5kg increases were repeated until 5RM failure.

    Only the 5RM sets were included in the statistical analysis.
    Once the 5RM was determined for the first exercise, the same protocol was used for the remaining three exercises.

  3. Josh Henkin
    Josh Henkin says:

    Hi Mike, thank you for posting such interesting information. I went to look at the study and the abstract doesn’t have any information on the intensity of the load used. Would you happen to have the full study and know? Thank you and keep up the great work!

Trackbacks & Pingbacks

  1. […] The Effect of Ipsilateral and Contralateral on Muscle Activity During the Lunge – Mike Reinold […]

  2. […] The Effect of Ipsilateral and Contralateral Loading on Muscle Activity During the Lunge […]

Comments are closed.